Gas Has Grown Up—But It Hasn’t Taken the Throne

Has gas gained ground over the last twenty years relative to oil?

Yes.

Unequivocally.

Has the case for gas become more compelling?

Also yes—though that answer tends to surprise those who prefer their energy narratives simple and binary.

Because twenty years ago, the world looked very different.

Liquefied natural gas was a niche.

A specialist solution.

Something discussed in conference rooms rather than encountered in daily infrastructure.

Ships?

Almost none ran on LNG.

Today, you can barely get through a week without another LNG-fuelled vessel being announced, ordered, or launched.

In maritime circles, LNG has moved from curiosity to normality.

Quietly.

Relentlessly.

Without the need for slogans.

The same transformation has played out on land.

Two decades ago, trying to fuel a truck with LNG in Europe was an exercise in frustration.

Outside of Spain, you were effectively stranded.

Infrastructure simply did not exist.

Today?

That map has been redrawn.

LNG fueling corridors stretch across most of Europe.

Patchy in places—particularly in parts of the Balkans—but undeniably present.

Functional.

Scaling.

And this is not a European curiosity.

North America has followed suit.

Different pace.

Different structure.

Same direction.

Even China, never shy about experimenting at scale, has leaned into gas in its own peculiar way—trucking LNG into remote regions like Inner Mongolia to feed smaller gas turbines.

Not elegant.

But effective.

And telling.

Gas is no longer confined to pipelines and power plants.

It is mobile.

Adaptable.

Versatile.

It is, in a word, growing up.

And then, as if to underline the point with a touch of theater, gas has even made its way off the planet.

Methane—LNG in its purest form—has become central to modern rocketry.

The rise of methalox propulsion, pairing methane with liquid oxygen, is not an accident.

It is a deliberate shift toward cleaner combustion, better reusability, and improved performance characteristics.

If you are building serious rockets today, you are likely working with methane.

Or planning to.

SpaceX certainly is.

Starship runs on it.

Others are following.

In space, of all places, gas has established itself as the forward-looking option.

Not bad for something once dismissed as a transitional fuel.

So yes, gas has advanced.

Substantially.

Across sectors.

Across continents.

Across expectations.

The current tensions around the Persian Gulf will pass—as they always do.

Because nations, for all their rhetoric, eventually rediscover the need to make money.

To trade.

To stabilize.

And when they do, LNG will continue its march.

Infrastructure will expand.

Use cases will multiply.

Markets will deepen.

All of that is already in motion.

But here is where restraint is required.

Because progress invites exaggeration.

And exaggeration invites bad conclusions.

Has gas improved its position?

Yes.

Has it become indispensable in many areas?

Also yes.

Will it replace oil?

No.

At least not in any meaningful sense within the foreseeable future.

Because oil is not merely a fuel.

It is a system.

A dense, energy-rich, easily transportable liquid that underpins transportation, petrochemicals, agriculture, and a long list of industrial processes.

Gas, for all its advantages, plays a different game.

It is less dense.

More complex to store and transport.

Dependent on infrastructure that is capital-intensive and, in many cases, geographically constrained.

It excels in certain roles.

Power generation.

Heating.

Certain transport niches.

Now even spaceflight.

But replacing oil wholesale?

That is a far steeper climb than the current enthusiasm suggests.

What we are witnessing is not substitution.

It is expansion.

Gas is taking share where it makes sense.

Where technology allows.

Where economics align.

But oil remains entrenched in domains that are not easily displaced.

And likely will remain so for quite some time.

Which is not a failure of gas.

It is a reflection of reality.

Energy systems are layered.

Redundant.

Slow to change.

They evolve.

They rarely revolutionize overnight.

So yes—acknowledge the rise of gas.

It deserves it.

But do not crown it prematurely.

Because thrones in energy are not seized by momentum alone.

They are earned through density, reliability, infrastructure, and time.

Gas has made impressive gains.

But the kingdom it is approaching is older, deeper, and far more entrenched than many care to admit.

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20260424-has-gas-replaced-oil-lng-geopolitics-in-a-middle-east-at-war/